Conflict Resolution and Reconciliation in Multidatabase S..
نویسندگان
چکیده
A multidatabase system is built upon a number of existing database systems. It requires an interface to allow users to access global heterogeneous information within a reconciled platform as well as to maintain the data consistence and integrity among existing database systems. As a result, a higher level semantic global database schema is needed. The global schema is a single schema derived from a set of autonomous databases by schema integration. This paper presents a new methodology to integrate the independent local database schemas into a global database schema. These schemas are converted from the local databases to Extended Entity Relationship (EER) models. Equivalency of domain, attribute, entity, and relationship are identified between two of these EER models. While a discovery and resolution mechanism by using these equivalent definitions is applied to deal with the naming conflict and structural conflict between two EER models, a reconciled semantic view between the two EER models is established. A semantic merge mechanism by using data analysis technique is also applied to extract more semantics during the merge phase. Two local database schemas are then integrated. These steps are repeated until the schemas of all databases to be integrated have been consolidated into a single global schema.
منابع مشابه
The priority of Change Motivation to contemplation motivation: interpersonal conflict resolution
There are Various motives that some of them can help to resolving interpersonal conflicts and others may prevent its resolve. According to the regulation style theory, the motivation for change, i.e. the desire to come out of the current state of conflict, can help to conflict resolution, but there is an opposite motivation, one that prevents the resolution of the conflict, and it is the motiva...
متن کاملSemantic Heterogeneity in Multidatabase Systems: A Review and a Proposed Meta-Data Structure
This article reviews current research on the issue of semantic conflict resolution in multidatabase system design. It is observed that in multidatabase systems, semantic conflicts need to be resolved at both schema level and instance level. Based on the literature review, a new taxonomy for differentiating semantic conflicts and a meta-data representation incorporating the taxonomy are proposed...
متن کاملInteractive example-driven integration and reconciliation for accessing database federations
The integration of heterogeneous databases affects two main problems: schema integration and instance integration. At both levels a mapping from local elements to global elements is specified and various conflicts caused by the heterogeneity of the sources have to be resolved. For the detection and resolution of instance-level conflicts we propose an interactive, example-driven approach. The ba...
متن کاملSemantic Integration in Multidatabase Systems: How Much Can We Integrate?
This chapter reviews briefly the semantic integration issues in multidatabase development and provides a standardized representation for classifying semantic conflicts. We begin by summarizing the methods and issues in multidatabase design. From the perspective of database integration, we identify that semantic conflict is the main issue. We explore the idea further by examining semantic confli...
متن کاملStrong Conflict Weak Conflict Transaction ’ s Operation Conflicting Operation Single Atomic
Interactions are open nested exible transactions used to deene long-lived tasks that access multiple heterogeneous databases. Interactions operate on a multidatabase where the local databases are accessed via procedures called steps. The steps in a local database encapsulate its information and allow it to be accessed uniformly. In this paper, we focus on issues of exible task speciication in a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2000